Australia has NOT proposed amendments to the IHR. Like many nations, Australia is at risk of losing its sovereignty to the World Health Organization due to proposals submitted by many OTHER nations.
More than any other nation, the people and public servants of Australia have begun to speak out clearly against the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
Senator Rennick has communicated the following via email:
Thank you for your email regarding your concerns about the World Health Organisation (WHO) and its proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).
The proposed changes to the IHR are indeed concerning as they would greatly increase the scope and range of power the WHO would have in the event of a pandemic. These new powers would contravene individual rights in the name of public health, something which was already rampantly occurring during the Covid-19 pandemic, except this time it would be done at the command of a globalist organisation.
The World Health Organisation already has too much influence on decisions made by the Australian government. The Chief Medical Officer admitted in Senate estimates that the IHR was a major reason why Australia shut its borders shut for so long.
I have written a letter to the Health Minister asking whether the changes to the IHR would make it legally binding for member states- a move that would be unprecedented for an unelected supranational bureaucracy to impose laws on sovereign countries. Australian laws should be made by representatives elected to the Australian Parliament.
Thank you for taking the time to write to me on this matter. I will continue to fight against government and non-government overreach.
Please watch the videos below…
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (46 pages): https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Compilation-en.pdf
ORIGINAL SUBMISSIONS (197 pages): https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Submissions-en.pdf
CURRENT IHR (84 pages): https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241580496