From: erich.neug erich.neug@protonmail.com
To: Minister.Hildyard@sa.gov.au
CC: heysen@parliament.sa.gov.au, curran.office@parliament.sa.gov.au, ‘Jennifer Squires'<jsquires@tntradio.live>, avi@rebelnews.com, black@parliament.sa.gov.au, editor@yrn.com.au, enquiry@epochtimes.com.au, Health:Minister for Health<ministerforhealth@sa.gov.au>, matt.welch@victorharbortimes.com.au, Premier@sa.gov.au, rowan.dean@bigpond.com, schubert@parliament.sa.gov.au, sophie.conlon@victorharbortimes.com.au, tiser@theadvertiser.com.au, Tony Nikolic<tony@aflsolicitors.com.au>, Rennick, Gerard (Senator)<Senator.Rennick@aph.gov.au>, senator.antic@aph.gov.au, Roberts, Malcolm (Senator)<Senator.Roberts@aph.gov.au>, Game, Jennifer (Sen P. Hanson)<jennifer.game@aph.gov.au>, game.office@parliament.sa.gov.au, senator.babet@aph.gov.au, elisa@courier.net.au, editor@spectator.com.au
Date: Thursday, February 23rd, 2023 at 1:13 PM
To:
Katrine Hildyard, Minister for Child Protection, South Australian Government. – Minister.Hildyard@sa.gov.au
Regarding: Ongoing emerging information and data regarding COVID-19 Vaccine harm in children.
Dear Katrine,
I am following up on nearly 2 years of correspondence sent to Australia’s politicians and bureaucrats, including yourself, raising concerns about the countermeasures deployed by both the State and Federal government, particularly regarding children (Attached). https://drive.proton.me/urls/J18MX2CB64#sNAAaxA6BTNK
I write to you today, again publicly, in light off a recent letter sent by the Australian Medical Professional’s Society (AMPS) to Dr Brendan Murphy, Secretary of the Department of Health found here – https://amps.redunion.com.au/stopvaccineinfants4yo
As always, I encourage you to read the whole letter to gain a full understanding of AMPS position and where I am coming from with my concerns, however I will quote some sections of the letter to set up for the very important questions I will raise further down.
Children are at near zero risk of serious or long-term health outcomes and death from the disease know as COVID-19, as was already known over 12 months ago (https://rumble.com/v1yfseu-remember-them-whenever-you-hear-of-children-suffering-adverse-events-from-t.html), but this from the AMPS letter:
“As outlined by ATAGI, most children with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic or experience a mild illness. Those who are symptomatic typically have a short illness with a median duration of 5 days[12][13]. Research findings demonstrate that children clear the virus more easily than adults and generate a robust, cross-reactive and sustained immune response to SARS-CoV-2.[14][15]This is especially true since the arrival of the Omicron variant, where clinical evidence suggests infections and their associated symptoms have been generally milder with data showing minimal risk posed to children, including those under 5[16][17]. Additionally, the most recent Paediatric SARS-CoV-2 Serosurvey 2022 Australia Summary Report clearly evidences most children and adolescents in Australia have been infected with the SARS-CoV-2, with low rates of hospitalisations[18].
“Data from the Australian government department of Health Website: Coronavirus (COVID-19) case numbers and statistics updated in May 2022 demonstrate a Case Fatality Rate (CFR) of 0.0428% for all age groups, with a recent study outlining Children 0-19 years experience an Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of 0.0003%[19]. Confirming this peer-reviewed literature is the complete absence of any Australian data able to demonstrate any healthy child has died as a direct result of Covid[20].”
“A Johns Hopkins study published in July 2021 monitored 48,000 children diagnosed with COVID-19 and found a mortality rate of zero among children without a pre-existing medical condition[22]. Additionally, a study in Nature demonstrated that children under 18 with no comorbidities have virtually no risk of death[23] from SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, a recent nationwide Icelandic study[24] of Covid-19 infections in children showed after three waves of infection, including the more severe Delta variant, no Icelandic child required hospitalisation, proving again Covid-19 is not life-threatening to children, nor does it cause serious debilitating outcomes in those children infected. Overall statistics show that the risk of death or serious debilitating conditions, especially in healthy children, is essentially statistically nil[25].”
Regarding efficacy, AMPS states:
“The clinical data used to support both AusPAR outcome recommendations are lacking or missing. The reports clearly demonstrate the vaccines do not prevent coronavirus and therefore do not meet the indication for which they have been approved[33].
In children another study from New York demonstrated the rapidly waning efficacy against the omicron variant, falling to 12% by 4-5 weeks and to negative values by 5-6 weeks post the second dose.[34] Similar findings to the New York study were noted in the Pfizer 0-4s trial with the efficacy after the first 2 doses falling to negative values, necessitating a change to the trial protocol. After the addition of a third dose for young children there were evidence to suggest efficacy from 7-30 days, but there was no data beyond 30 days to demonstrate any ongoing efficacy, waning timeframes or whether negative efficacy developed.[35]Such flawed findings cannot compete with natural immunity against Covid-19 re-infection, as recent studies[36] have clearly proved.”
But most concerning off all, and the main basis for my questions to you, with the hope you will investigate these further, relate to safety:
“….Instead AMPS impresses upon the Secretary of Health the obvious need to responsibly take into account the vast and unprecedented body of scientific research amassed over the last 18 months evidencing many adverse and crippling outcomes from these vaccines.[41]
Globally there is great concern about myocarditis[42][43] associated with these injections in young people, which is sadly but one of the many life-limiting adverse reactions found to be associated with these vaccines[44][45][46].
Within the age group <1-11 years old the following are some of the adverse reactions reported; death, chest pain, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke, vaginal haemorrhage, Kawasaki disease, Bell’s palsy, tinnitus, Ginnotti-Crosti syndrome, thrombocytopenia, seizure, and transverse myelitis.
There are now more than a thousand peer-reviewed studies evidencing adverse effects post COVID vaccination[47]. Severe reactions, many involving lifelong harms, are still yet to be properly quantified by public health officials; this brings about an extraordinary state of affairs that calls for the strictest application of the Precautionary Principle in respect of our youngest and most vulnerable children[48]. Extreme caution is required now that it is known there is minimal risk posed to children from SARS-CoV-2.
Prior claims Covid-19 infection leads to increased myocarditis and pericarditis have been found untrue.[49] In fact, it has been shown that Covid-19 vaccination is causing substantial rates of myocarditis and pericarditis[50].
Animal biodistribution studies showed the lipid nanoparticles concentrate in ovaries and testes,[51] with added concern now data are demonstrating that mRNA from Covid-19 vaccines can be reverse-transcribed[52].
It is also critically important to be aware of the as-yet unknown effects on young children’s developing immune systems from these novel gene-based drugs. The tiny number of participants in the trial makes it impossible to rule out potential adverse outcomes such as antibody-dependent enhancement, the unanswered question of original antigenic sin, and the possibility of developing impaired immune function[53][54][55].”
As mentioned, I encourage you to read the whole letter, but I trust you understand my position based on the entirety of my previous correspondence as well as this comprehensive letter formulated by AMPS.
So, bearing in mind all our obligations regarding mandated notifications, which I have pointed out in my numerous correspondences, namely:
“Forming a suspicion on reasonable grounds, A mandated notifier must make a report to the Department for Child Protection
if they suspect on reasonable grounds that a child or young person is, or may be, at risk of harm. A mandated notifier does not
have to be able to p rove that harm has actually occurred.”
“Failing to report, A failure by a mandated notifier to report a suspicion formed on reasonable grounds that a child or young
person is, or may be at risk may result in a person being prosecuted and a court imposing a fine. See section 31(1) of the
Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017″
“A mandated notifier who reports a suspicion in accordance with the Act cannot be held to have breached any code of
professional etiquette or ethics, or to have departed from any acceptable form of professional conduct (section 166(4) of
the Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017)”.
Here are my questions:
1. As I have been made aware this occurred, will you investigate if any child under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection was strongly encouraged, bribed or coerced to receive any dose of the COVID-19 Vaccine and report the findings?
2. Were all children under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection made fully aware of all the possible adverse events associated with the approved COVID-19 Vaccines, prior to them being administered?
3. Were all cares/guardians for children under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection made fully aware of all the possible adverse events associated with the approved COVID-19 Vaccines, prior to them being administered to the children under their care?
4. Does the Department for Child Protection (DCP) have a full and comprehensive readily accessible records of all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received one or more doses of COVID-19 Vaccines?
5. Does this readily available record contain information relating to the Vaccine product received and on what date/s?
6. As the DCP have been alerted by me since October 2021, about concerns surrounding safety of the COVID-19 vaccines, has the DCP put in place any ongoing health monitoring mechanisms for all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received the COVID-19 Vaccine/s?
7. Does the DCP maintain records for any child under the guardianship of the Minister who has received a COVID-19 Vaccine and HAS had an adverse event, ongoing health concerns or has died after receiving a COVID-19 Vaccine?
8. What mechanisms are in place for the DCP to maintain long term records for all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received the COVID-19 vaccine/s for possible future reparations?
9. Has the DCP considered that a fund may need to be set up to cover the cost of future reparations, considering the mounting evidence of what’s currently known about the safety concerns of the COVID-19 vaccines, and the lack of long-term safety data available as per traditional immunisation products?
I look forward to your response.
Sincerely
Mark Neugebauer
23rd February 2023