Submission by Michael Darby, 16 March 2023
· Term of reference A
a) Pandemic planning and preparedness, specifically:
I. Public sector pandemic plans and policies; and
II. Public sector capacity and capability.
1. How well prepared was the WA Government for COVID-19 when it arrived? Was the WA Government Pandemic Plan fit for purpose?
a. The WA Government should have focussed upon protecting the vulnerable, particularly the elderly, by making available, free, significant quantities of inexpensive vitamin D, and providing scientifically designed early treatment protocols for any person suspected. of suffering from Covid-19. By ignoring these issues, the Government’s plan was a failure.
b. A good plan would have saved 85% of all who died. And because asymptomatic persons cannot transmit Covid-19, a good plan would have snuffed out the pandemic.
2. What can the WA public sector do to make sure it is flexible enough to respond quickly to any future pandemics, while continuing to deliver core services?
a. Restore the doctor patient relationship
b. Never again threaten and coerce health professionals
Terms of reference B
b) Government programs and processes to support the health response, specifically:
III. COVID-19 testing, including the Free Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) program, procurement of ventilators, mask distribution, and vaccine rollout; and
IV. Digital solutions (e.g. PHOCUS, VaccinateWA, G2G, SafeWA and ServiceWA).
3. Which WA Government programs were most effective in supporting the COVID-19 response? Which were less effective? Why?
a. I am unaware of any effective WA Government programmes. Mask wearing, lockdowns, the banning of the 2021 Anzac March, bans on travel, wicked coercion of health care workers, police and others, and imprisonment and career destruction inflicted upon a young dentist, all served no purpose other than to impose obedience training on the population.
b. None of these programs can be justified on any basis other than the Government’s determination to support the Prime Minister’s disgraceful determination to maximise the profits of Big Pharma.
4. What additional programs or supports could have been provided to support the community?
a. Uttar Pradesh (260 million people) stopped the pandemic by early treatment protocols using ivermectin. Western Australia should have done the same.
b. The concept of community support required the WA Government to protect the community, by refusing to indemnify Big Pharma against all claims for damage done by their products. There is no excuse for this indemnity, and zero excuse for failing to rescind, in the light of the avalanche of truth which has revealed damning evidence of vaccine harm.
c. There is a shameful lack of governmental support for the victims of vaccine harm. Government representatives and their sycophantic allies in mainstream media pretend that the victims of vaccine harm do not exist. (This is certainly true in respect of those who have died.) Moreover the same government representatives and the same media presenters continue to chant in unison “Safe and effective”.
d. Totally ignored by the WA Government and its collaborators in the National Cabinet’s subservience to Big Pharma, there is an urgent need for medical research into vaccine harm and how to ameliorate the suffering of its victims and prolong their lives.
Terms of reference C
c) Intragovernmental communication and cooperation, specifically:
V. Structures and resource mobilisation across the public sector; and
VI. Data collection, sharing and use.
5. What parts of the WA Government’s COVID-19 response were well-coordinated and where could it have been improved?
a. The attack on personal liberty was certainly well coordinated, even to the extent that courts of law were eager to do the government’s bidding.
b. An example is the gaoling of highly qualified Ukraine-born dentist Nataliia Nairn and the destruction of her career. The government wanted an example made of this 31-year-old with four degrees, to punish her for treating her patients after police seized her appointment book to compare with her flight from Canberra. Contrast her treatment with the slap with a feather dealt out to Nev Power. Dr Nairn is now in Ukraine, providing free dental care to the heroic defenders against Russian aggression.
c. The Government’s vaccinate-at-all costs response was well-coordinated, at great cost to the innocent victims of vaccine harm. On 8 December 2020, as I recall, the WA Premier revealed his intention to inflict mRNA experimental drugs upon schoolchildren. There was never any scientific basis for “vaccinating” adolescents, nor children, nor Covid recoverees. And there was always a compelling scientific basis for not “vaccinating” pregnant women, women of childbearing age, infants and babies.
6. How could the WA Government better cooperate across the public sector to respond to a pandemic in the future?
a. Early treatment protocols
b. No lock-downs
c. No coercive vaccination
d. No travel restrictions unless designed to reduce risk to remote communities caused by potentially infected visitors.
e. Temperature testing is an easy way to protect any vulnerable environment.. Infra-red cameras automatically read temperatures. This is what should happen: “Hey, I’m the computer. You might have Covid-19, as your temperature is over 38 degrees Celsius. Pick up your early treatment kit from the table and go home. Follow the instructions. There is zinc, vitamin D, ivermectin for 5 days, azithromycin, vitamin C and Quercetin, plus Betadine to gargle with. No cold drinks. Hot tea is good. Hot shower with lots of steam is also good. You should feel an improvement within 24 hours. If your condition deteriorates in any way, or if you are not noticeably improved in three days, visit your genera practitioner.”
Terms of reference D
d) Community support, engagement, and communication, specifically:
VII. Public communications and campaigns; and
VIII. Industry and community engagement.
7. Were you satisfied with communications from the WA Government about COVID-19 and how accessible did you find them?
a. The WA Government inexcusably replicated other jurisdictions by pushing this counterproductive and dangerous message: “If you are sick go home. Stay there until you get really sick, then call an ambulance.” Thousands of individuals who tested positive for Covid were given no treatment and no helpful advice of any kind.
8. What could the WA Government do to improve communications in the future?
a. Restore the doctor – patient-relationship.
b. Cease sneering at individuals who question Government policy.
Terms of reference E:
e) The effectiveness of public health levers on health outcomes, specifically:
IX. Public health and social measures, including borders; and
X. Testing, tracing, isolation, and quarantine.
Background
9. What other health measures could have been used, or used differently?
a. Hi temperature detection by infra red cameras built into dispensers purveying early treatment kits/ Preferably at minimum cost, Say $5, with a sign: “Press button for a freebie if you are too poor to pay”
Supporting notes:
A. Matthew Tune article, 23 January 2023
A year has passed since the Defeat the Mandates March to the Lincoln Memorial on 23 January 2022. Matthew Tune reminds us of the wisdom contributed by contributors to that notable event:
Peter McCullough, MD, MPH
“This country has been wrecked by a virus that’s been here for two years and the doctors who stand in front of you, early on in the pandemic used all their clinical skills and knowledge and compassionately treated each and every high-risk patient to the best of their ability to prevent two bad outcomes: hospitalization and death. And they have demonstrated through the totality of their work. They have demonstrated that the vast majority of hospitalizations and deaths that occurred in this country could have been prevented.”
Richard Urso, MD
“So today we represent 17,000 doctors and scientists and humanity. We have three virtually indisputable recommendations backed by high quality data. And I have one ask for you. Today you are going to hear the truth. And I ask you to have the courage to join us to help our future generations resist this tyranny!”
Heather Gessling, MD
“Healthy children should not be forced to be subjected to vaccinations. They face negligible risk from COVID but face potential permanent and irreversible risk to their health if vaccinated including heart, brain, reproductive and immune system damage.”
Lynn Fynn, MD
“Natural immunity denial has prolonged this pandemic. And it has needlessly restricted the lives of COVID-recovered people. And it has delayed the virus’ transition to endemic status.”
Pierre Kory, MD, MPA
“We are fighting against Big Pharma. They have controlled and captured our health agencies. Every single policy they have issued out of these agencies the entire pandemic was written by the pharmaceutical industry. And that is a war on repurposed drugs. We’ve known now for two years that there are cheap, safe, highly effective and widely available medicines that can treat this disease. That information has been suppressed. We are in a war of information.”
Paul Marik, MD, FCCM, FCCP
“Let doctors be doctors! Hospital administrators, government officials should not tell physicians how to treat their own patients. They are interfering with the basic physician, patient relationship.”
Ryan Cole, MD
“When you wake up in the morning, CNN, did you say to yourself I’m going to cancel and censor doctors so that people can die? We hold you responsible too.”
Aaron Kheriaty, MD
“With vaccine mandates and passports, we are now seeing the emergence of a biosecurity surveillance regime. The welding of digital technologies to public health and police power are leading to unprecedented invasions on our privacy and intrusive methods of control.”
Robert Malone, MD, MS
“Regarding the genetic COVID vaccines, the science is settled. They are not working. They are not completely safe. These vaccines do not prevent Omicron infection, viral replication or spread to others. These vaccines are leaky, they have poor durability, and even if every man, woman and child in the United States were vaccinated, these products cannot achieve herd immunity and stop COVID. They are not completely safe, and the full nature of the risks remain unknown. In contrast, the natural immunity which healthy immune systems develop after infection and recovery from COVID, is long-lasting, broad and highly protective from disease and death caused from this virus. If there is risk, there must be choice. This is the fundamental bedrock truth of modern bio-ethics.”
B. Open Letter, 13 September 2021
This letter demonstrates that the scourge of mRNA Vaccine Harm is not new. The site www.vaxharm.net was established early in 2021. The Facebook Group, VAXHARM Victims of Vaccines Support Group with 2,177 members, welcomes new members: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1325528054584631/people
OPEN LETTER AND NOTICE OF LIABILITY FROM DOCTORS AND SCIENTISTS, TO THE EMA AND THE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT REGARDING COVID-19 VACCINATION
September 13, 2021
This Notice of Liability has been SERVED to you personally.
In March 2021, we alerted you and the world to the fact that the approval of the so-called gene-based COVID-19 vaccines was premature and reckless, and that their administration constituted human experimentation in violation of the Nuremberg Code. Our concerns regarding the potential dangers of experimental agents were founded on common textbook knowledge of immunobiology and medicine. Simple reasoning led to the foresight that administration of the agents would incur multifaceted pathological events leading, among others, to life-threatening thromboembolic events. You were called upon to suspend the vaccination program until these concerns had been tended to in a satisfactory manner.
This request was scorned and the vaccination program has been rolled out on a global scale, with catastrophic consequences that we trust are known to you. Our original fears have been confirmed and further pathways leading to injury and death by the experimental agents have been uncovered through new scientific discoveries in 2021. The rush to vaccinate first and research later has left you in a position whereby COVID-19 vaccination policy is now entirely divorced from the relevant evidence base.
As you consider your next steps in mandating a vaccine that is contra-indicated by science, we draw your attention to recently published Freedom of Information requests, which reveal gross negligence in the COVID vaccine authorisation process, including misleading the Commission on Human Medicines as to whether any independent verification of vaccine trial data had occurred.
Hapless and defenceless children are now becoming victims of the blasphemic and negligently regulated vaccination agenda. We charge you for actively or tacitly paving the way to the second holocaust of mankind. The same charge has been independently submitted by survivors of the first holocaust and their families.
You are hereby placed on notice that you stand to be held personally and individually responsible for causing foreseeable and preventable harm and death from COVID-19 vaccines, and for supporting crimes against humanity, defined as acts that are purposely committed as part of a widespread or systematic policy, directed against civilians, committed in furtherance of state policy.
The gravity of your deeds is now laid out before the world. For the sake of yourselves and your families, rise and respond. Or go down in history books in indelible shame and disgrace.
Signed,
Doctors for Covid Ethics
Cc: Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
C. The Jordon Waker Disclosures, 25 January 2023
[NEW YORK – Jan. 25, 2023] Project Veritas released a new video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” to pre-empt the development of future vaccines. LINK
Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed on it.
The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public.
About Project Veritas
James O’Keefe established Project Veritas in 2010 as a non-profit journalism enterprise to continue his undercover reporting work. Today, Project Veritas investigates and exposes corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions to achieve a more ethical and transparent society and to engage in litigation to: protect, defend and expand human and civil rights secured by law, specifically First Amendment rights including promoting the free exchange of ideas in a digital world; combat and defeat censorship of any ideology; promote truthful reporting; and defend freedom of speech and association issues including the right to anonymity. O’Keefe serves as the CEO and Chairman of the Board so that he can continue to lead and teach his fellow journalists, as well as protect and nurture the Project Veritas culture.
James O’Keefe of Project Veritas talked to Dr. Robert Malone, physician, scientist, and author to get his take on the comments made by Jordon Walker. LINK
Dr. Robert Malone: “You’re gaining function, you’re creating a new function in virus one by adding elements from virus two, infecting one monkey and then another monkey. That’s called serial passage. That appears to have been one of the technologies deployed in the Wuhan Institute of Virology with the humanized mouse strains that I believe were obtained from EcoHealth Alliance. That’s an example of directed evolution.
‘The gentleman seems to have absolutely no moral compass at all about what he’s doing. The hubris and arrogance and immaturity. If this is the quality of individuals within Pfizer that are making these huge decisions that risk global public health with such a casual disregard for the human toll, it’s profoundly corrupt in terms of would it be feasible for Pfizer to circumvent international or national law? I think that is undeniable.
‘And the gentleman in your investigative work has clearly indicated that Pfizer believes that it has successfully captured the regulatory apparatus of the United States government and presumably worldwide. Pfizer has completed regulatory capture, is quite proud of it.”
Thank you James O’Keefe and Dr Robert Malone.
The criminal organisation Pfizer, a world leader in human sacrifice, exerts a profound and malign influence upon Australian governments and bureaucrats.
If our rulers had any moral compass (the term so eloquently applied by Dr Malone), they would:
1. Rescind the indemnity granted to Pfizer and other members of the Big Pharma Cabal.
2. Cease immediately all programs of mRNA vaccination, while preserving the right of a doctor to prescribe for a willing patient fully informed of the risks.
3. Focus maximum resources upon medical research to determine the extent of harm caused by mRNA vaccines, minimise the death rate and ameliorate the condition of survivors.
4. Launch a Royal Commission, terms of reference to include:
a. What has been the total expenditure in Australia on mRNA vaccinations?
b. Which politicians gained from decisions favourable to Big Pharma?
c. Which bureaucrats gained from decisions favourable to Big Pharma?
d. What are the details of all payments made to Australian lobbyists by Big Pharma?
e. What are the political connections of all such lobbyists and to what degree do they control the endorsement of political candidates?.
f. Which media writers and presenters deliberately served the interests of Big Pharma and why?
g. What was the exact process which led to media presenters, especially but not limited to ABC employees, chanting in unison the slogan “Vaccines are safe and effective”?
h. To what extent was Big Pharma involved n the decision making process which banned early treatment protocols involving safe repurposed medications hydroxycholorquine and ivermectin?
i. How many Australians unnecessarily died as a result of that ban?
j. What was the role of Big Pharma in decisions to extend vaccinations to adolescents, pregnant women, infants, Covid recoverees and even babies?
k. How, why and by whom was a change initiated which transform the definition of “vaccinated” from one jab to two jabs, then through the artifice of “boosters” from two jabs to three, then from three jabs to four?
l. To what extent has Big Pharma been instrumental in persuading politicians, the bureaucracy and mainstream media to treat with contempt the victims of vaccine harm; denying their existence, refusing to meet with them, and failing to provide then with compassion, care and compensation?
m. Is it accurate to describe the victims of vaccine harm, including dead Australians assessed by Drs Rancourt, Baudin and Mercier at 31,000 LINK, as human sacrifices on the altar of Big Pharma profits?
n. How many deaths, how many incapacitations and how many other injuries should rightly be attributed to mRNA vaccines?
o. How many Australians were forced against their will to accept mRNA experimental drugs?
p. What was the Big Pharma involvement in devising strategies and propaganda to hide the risks and increase acceptance of mRNA experimental drugs?
q. How many “fully vaccinated” Australian residents have contracted COVID-19 more than once?
r. How many unvaccinated Australians have contracted COVID-19 more than once?
s. What is the total of hydroxychloroquine seized by all Australian authorities and where is it now?
t. What is the total of ivermectin seized by all Australian authorities and where is it now?
u. To what extent has Big Pharma influenced decisions by AHPRA to withdraw the right of medical professional to practise their craft?
v. What prima facie criminal acts have been committed
Source – https://stophumansacrifice.substack.com/p/review-of-was-covid-19-management